Sachin Swami v. State Of Ut, Chd And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48410-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.10.2025 Sachin Swami ....Petitioner

Versus

State of UT, Chandigarh and Anr.

....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR

Present:

Mr. Manish Pratap Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Addl. PP UT Chandigarh. Ms. Navneet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. (Oral) The present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, is for quashing of FIR No.29 dated 02.04.2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, U.T. Chandigarh, along with all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P-2).

This Court vide order dated 01.09.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua genuineness of the compromise.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh and got their statements recorded. On the basis of statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has JYOTI 2025.10.29 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-48410-2025 (O&M) submitted his report dated 15.10.2025 and submitted that as per the statement of the parties, the compromise (Annexure P-2) effected between them appears to be genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.

Learned State Counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR No.29 dated 02.04.2025.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.29 dated 02.04.2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, U.T. Chandigarh, along with all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner.

(SUKHVINDER KAUR) 27.10.2025 JUDGE jyoti3 Whether reasoned/speaking:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No JYOTI 2025.10.29 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document