Anju v. Indian Oil Corporation And Others
!" #$%&'(%)*+*&, -- .- /+-
0 1 ---11 !20!-1 !10
!
"
# # $ %
& '''' !103 0"
( ) **&+**, - . ) ) / 0!
*0 1 23456/
0!
*0 1234160
*0**234*06 *, *0** 23 4*/6 $ % 7 * ( 8 *
*0 5 */
* *0 5 8 ( 9 4.$ $ (:; - 88 8 8% $ ) <.
( $ ( =<. %8 % 8
<.) (<. 88 */
*0*08 $ ) > - 8% ( 4 - $ 9 4...
( 8 9 4... 8 /
8 %
$ ) 8<. $78 ( $ 8 8 $
8 $ ) 9 4...
( 05 *0** - 8 <.
(
% $ 8 $ 00088 8<.
$ 8 % $ <)$% !
. & ( % 8
** $ 7 % : ; - 88 - ( $ # % ) ( $ $ 8 $ 000 8 8 ( $ ( ) $
( %) 88
<.$ % $8 >-8 8 ) > - 8% ( <. >- 05 *0** >- 8<.
( 3 05 *0** "Second thing which I want to draw your attention that why company doesn't mention the whole procedure on mail which is sending by company i.e. also not in proper serial. I means that why company want an NHAl clarification on rejected land (khasra number 224). I received a mail dated on 13th May 2019 or 31st May 2019 that land is rejected and arrange a alterative suitable and within the period of three months from the date of letter. On that basis I provide alternative suitable land i.e. khasra number 319, 320, 321, 324, 325,326 in stipulated time which was enough space for RO outlet from another RO outlet. Why not the LEC committee did not inspect the land. Sir, I want an explanation of this. Why your company want clarification on rejected land (which is khasra number 224).
Why not they inspect alternative suitable land which I provide this is sure a partiality towards me. Because I have an enough space for Retaill outlet from 1000m. During all this process of whole 4 years there is not any HPCL petrol pump in my location can you give me an explanation on this matter." , ? 8 4 $ $ ) >- 8 <. $ ( ) $ 9 4...
. $
) - 8 ) %8 ) 8 26 % 0, 0* *0* 4!105 8 7 @ )+ A+ @ A+