Om Parkash And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.89 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.05.2022 Dr. Om Parkash and ors.

..Appellant (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and ors.

..Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL PresentMr. Sarvesh Malik, Advocate, Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate, Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate, Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate, Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate, Mr. Parveen Kaushik, Advocate, Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate, Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev K. Aggarwal, Advocate, Mr. Ojas Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Tejas Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate for Mr. S.P. Khatri, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana and Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. P.S. Saini, Advocate for HSIIDC.

*** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No.186 & 187-CI of 2020 For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed and delay of 445 days in refiling and 6 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Main Case For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No.3149 of 2018 titled as Jaipal and ors. vs. State of Haryana and ors. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

23.05.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ASHOK KUMAR 2022.07.07 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document