Dilbagh Singh v. State Of Punjab

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52885-2024 Date of Decision: 23.10.2024 Dilbagh Singh ......... PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present

Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advocate for the peƟƟoner. (through video conferencing). Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 04.08.2024 Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur 323, 325, 34 IPC 1.

The present peƟƟon has been filed under SecƟon 528 of BNSS, 2023 for issuance of direcƟons to respondents No.2 and 3 to invesƟgate the maƩer properly and to add SecƟon 326 IPC in above capƟoned FIR.

2.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through the State's counsel. Given the nature of order, this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondent nor issuance of noƟce to the private respondent is required. 3.

The peƟƟoner's grievance is that the corresponding provision which would relate to the injury received and weapon used have not been added. 4.

However, State counsel on instrucƟons submits that the argument is incorrect and the right secƟon has already been inserted. 5.

Be that as it may, let the invesƟgator to put up the case file before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur for its perusal, who shall himself/herself verify the invesƟgaƟon and shall issue necessary direcƟon to the invesƟgator, if need so arise. 6.

Given above, the present peƟƟon stands disposed of with aforesaid observaƟons. All pending miscellaneous applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.10.2024 JyoƟ-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2024.10.28 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.