Abraham Thomas v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-37933-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-37933-2018 Date of decision: - 21.12.2018 Abraham Thomas ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present case, the petitioner is praying that his pay was wrongly fixed while implementing the revision as carried out w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and thereafter from 01.01.2006.

Petitioner has already been retired from service on 30.09.2009 and the present writ petition has been filed by him after more than nine years of the retirement. Even the representation which the petitioner has supposed to have given is dated 15.12.2017 (Annexure P-9).

Today, during the course of the hearing counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound is issued to the respondents to decide his representation dated 15.12.2017 (Annexure P-9) by passing a speaking order. NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.24 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-37933-2018 -2In view of the request made, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 15.12.2017 (Annexure P-9) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case after the decision, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for refixation of salary with retrospective effect, the same shall be done notionally and no arrears shall be given to him.

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) December 21, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.24 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh