Sushma And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-61994-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-61994-2018 Date of decision: - 24.12.2018 Sushma and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. S.K. Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent No.4.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present petition, the petitioners are seeking protection to the life and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 as they have married against the wishes of their parents.

In pursuance of order dated 20.12.2018, both the parties are present in Court and the presence of petitioner No.1 has been secured by ASI Naresh Kumar, Posted at Police Station Sadar, Jind. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, appears on behalf of the respondent(s)-State and states that petitioner No.1 has given a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has expressed her desire to live with petitioner No.2 as she has married him with her own free will.

NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.24 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-61994-2018 -2Mr. Gaje Singh (respondent No.4), who is father of petitioner No.1, is also present in Court and he states that he has no objection if his daughter (petitioner No.1) wants to live with petitioner No.2 after marriage and there will be no hindrance caused by the private respondents in any manner.

In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present matter, therefore, the present petition is accordingly stands disposed of.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) December 24, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.24 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh