Rambir Singh And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

2023:PHHC:145307 CWP-24595-2023 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24595-2023 Date of Decision: 16.11.2023 Rambir Singh and others

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Surender Pal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. AG, Haryana *** TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari for setting aside the impugned order dated 18.10.2023, Annexure P5, issued by respondent No.2 vide which Permanent Districts reserved for allocation to the JBT/PRT Teachers of ESM category have been allotted to the JBT/PRT Teachers of Dependent of Ex-servicemen (DESM) and Dependent of Freedom Fighters (DFF) categories by treating the DESM and DFF as ESM and thereby granting benefit of reservation to the DESM/DFF on priority against the vacancies reserved for JBT/PRT of ESM category. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending representations, Annexure P-7, in a specified period. PAYAL 2023.11.17 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2023:PHHC:145307 CWP-24595-2023 -23.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. AG, Haryana, appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending reprensentations shall be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously.

5.

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director, Department of Elementary Education, Haryana, to consider and decide the pending representations, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

6.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹25,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 16.11.2023 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2023.11.17 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment