Baldev Singh And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ANR
!
"# $!%&'&"() ** + , -
-*
****! & &"(!.
' ,!.'/'
-
***!'0"($!( ' ) 1+ -* - 2 -
!
" #
2 -
* *
. 3 $ %&'#()"&& * +,-." //0 #1 #0#0&/31443'02 ' -5&/#/6/4 -5 + & & * + + % 0'
0'
#0#478#
#
Reply dated 11.11.2024 has been filed on behalf of respondent-State in Court today. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
# / ++ $ 5 9 + ( 0 #0#4 % 56- *
+ + 9+ '
# #0#4 % :
+ 5 & % 9
%%9 ! %; ,-.** $ %9 +9 ! $,)5
!
"# +5 9 & 4(# 5 9 + 8 % * 9 +59
9 * % 99 ; $9* +
<%& 5 $
"
!
#% % ; %5 9 %%!5* +9
% $ '3
/ ;+ 8 "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.
xxx xxx xxx. "
( -9 8;+ + 5 + +
% %9 5 * +,-.9 * %9 %%! $9% ++ ; + %* . ! 9 ,-." //0 #1 #0#0&/31443'02 '-5&/#/6/4-5
+ & & * + * * % 0'
0'
#0#478# %; !
. 000068 % = , - >.
4 5 + 9 10.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
2 - **
4 ($!!0 = +6
?6" =. %
?6"