Rattan Singh v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
!
"#$
% & '
( )
!
"#$
% & '
!" * % +
!
$,-+
'
./ * ,-+
'
# $ 0 1&&
$$'
& +$2
'
!
& &$
$&
3 2 +
, )
+ !,
& 1 '
+$2 '
./ )
$
-
$ (56
7
2
' $!2
+
$!
+ $!2 '
& 9 006 0( 60:6
2 4
'
& 06 60:6 0 0 $ 2 $$
$) 2 $$
;:<'
& Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that he would be Neha 2025.09.03 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
%&'((&)'
%&'((*&)'
&& satisfied if the time bound direction be given to the respondent-Corporation to decide the representation(s) (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner(s) for granting the benefit of the past service rendered as daily wager from 04.01.1979 to 16.07.1987 and work charge service from 17.07.1987 to 23.10.1990 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that claim of the petitioner(s) suffers from delay and laches. However, the respondentCorporation will consider the claim of the petitioner(s) and decide the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking order. 5.
Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner(s), the respondent is directed to consider the representation(s) (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner(s) and pass a speaking order, after affording them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner(s). Needless to say, if the petitioner(s) is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by the respondent. However, the respondent-Corporation would be at liberty to consider the issue of limitation while passing a speaking order. 6.
Disposed of, accordingly.
7.
-' '!
) '$ $
$
) )( )'
'
45
= 5%
'
)$ = 5% Neha 2025.09.03 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document