Jagjit Singh v. The Financial Commissioner, Punjab And Others
!"# $%&%!' ( ( )*% +%'), ((((( % %!' - . -&/& , %'
'$% 0!11%&&%!' -2/'* 3 '#! , -&((((( &4!'# ' & 5 675(++
!"
# $%
#
+ 2( ' ( )& *) )*$+"' - .!" /
"'
/
$+ *$ )*$&"'
, 0 1 , 0 /"'
"' 1
2 ,
# $**34 " *+ *$ )*$) " / '
'
" 2 4 "
#4 "
/4 " / /
/ / 5
/ 1 6
" /
7 !
7!
2" 8 ' 9
# 7
# & 4 " 9
2
' 7 4 "
*+ *$ )*$) "'
" , 01 , 0 :/ / "'
$+ *$ )*$& "
" "'/'
$;!"4
$<<= :/ )& *) )*$+ 9 , "'
*+ *$ )*$) $+ *$ )*$& "' " "'/' 4 ' " / "
: "
: "
# &/
' '
: "
/+&'2
&>
#$
$
1 / ;>
# &/%)' '<
&?
#$?
! +> / # : "
4 """4 " "$>' :"
/ / # &4 " 4
/ 0 / "
' / : "
# &
:"
' / " "'
:
!
! "
#$$%
4 # & ' "
"' :"
/ # & '
# & ' 2 "
# & '< ' (
# : "
# & '
"' # "
/ '
9
# &/
/ " ' "'"
'
5 "
" "' '
'
:/
' ' @ ! "' # :
! !
'
""()' ! ("
#& % :"
" ' "
: ' 2 4 "
#4 "
/4 " / /
5
/ 1 6
" / 7 !
7!
2" / # &/
' '
8 /+&' 2 2 &>
#$
$
1 / ;> /# &/%) ' '< 2 &?
#$?
!
+> 2 # &/ 4 " 8
/# &/' /< A
# &/ (
/ " "
"'
5/
/ # & " "
4 "/ " /:B"
! Mahavir Singh Vs. Khiali Ram, 2009(1) RCR(Civil) 757 has held that the / ' "
!
'
""()' ! ("
#& % /
/ (
5 /
/ ' '
"'
' " ' "'
( ( :+ ;
0 3 C3#
"
C3#