Rahul Matia v. State Of Haryana

 
  
 



  !" #$%$!&'!( )* + ,

-    ./0 0  0
'

1-20
3- 4

Present:

Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

3- 4 ,25-6   

 

 





 



 

 



 





!"

#$% 

$&'$&$

 

 &( $& )&( $&*+

!

 , -

.

 $ / &$&$ *

+ 



 





 

 

1*
 

    

      

     

 



  

   !  "  #

$ "%&$   "  " '

$  

 

  (  )*     + $  

  

 

 

 ,

   (

  

  )  (   -  ./ "   $ .  .0$ %

  $      

( (  ,"   /        

1 (

    

 ( 22* !   

$   

3     (  !   &((   !   (  

$  .

  &(( 

    

$ 

 4   ( 

$  (    5 

        (   6

  



 

       

"  *7 (   ( 



 $ 28*9 

 





  2







 



    3 4 

 # CRM-M-547972024 has also been filed by the petitioner, thereby seeking quashing of the present FIR, on the basis of compromise.

4.

The learned counsel representing the complainant admits the factum of compromise and also admits that the complainant 







)   

 

 

 





 5   





6

4

 

 7

4

 8    

 

 ( !

4 

4





&$&$

*%!78  







1*
     

   (( 

 

 ((+ 

    

 

  



  / 

 $   

     5



  (  (   + 

    

/   ( 

 (



 



  (( 

   5

9

%  

 6

:

 !





 





  !





!"



 









44 

      #









4

4

 



 

  (KULDEEP TIWARI) November 05, 2024 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No