Gurwinder Singh @ Gurvinder @ Guri v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 1.

CRM-M No.51356 of 2024 Date of decision: January 22nd, 2025 Gurwinder Singh @ Gurvinder @ Guri .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent 2.

CRM-M No.61231 of 2024 Abhishek @ Shekhi .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-51356-2024).

Mr. Manjit Singh Gahlawat, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-61231-2024).

Mr. Rajat Gautam, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of the above-mentioned petitions filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, as they arise out of same FIR i.e. FIR No.120 dated 11.06.2024 under Sections 148/149/323/324/506/326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Siwan, District Kaithal.

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.01.22 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M Nos.

51356 and 61231 of 2024 2.

Vide order dated 18.10.2024 passed in CRM-M-513562024, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under:- "Learned senior counsel inter alia contends that even as per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner was shown to be armed only with a Danda. She submits that the grievous injury has not even been attributed to the petitioner and it is highly unlikely that the fingers of the complainant could have been amputated with a Danda, which the petitioner was allegedly armed with at the time of the occurrence in question." 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that in compliance of order dated 18.10.2024, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioners having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioners are not required for further investigation much less for their custodial interrogation.

5.

In view of the above, the petitions are allowed and interim order dated 18.10.2024 passed in CRM-M-51356-2024, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS.

6.

Copy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. January 22nd, 2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.01.22 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh