Sudesh Kumar Shukla v. State Of Punjab And Others
CWP No. 3818 of 2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3818 of 2019 Date of Decision: 12.07.2022 Sudesh Kumar Shukla -Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others -Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present:
None for the petitioner.
**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) The present writ petition was filed in the year 2019. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 12.02.2019, 10.04.2019, 09.07.2019, 14.10.2019 and 16.01.2020.
Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared only on 06.05.2019 and 27.11.2019 and the case was adjourned on his request. Even the prayer for preponement of the date of hearing was dismissed on 06.05.2019. On 16.01.2020, it was made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted to learned counsel for the petitioner. Even in the absence of learned counsel for the petitioner, I have perused the impugned order, Annexure P-10.
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.07.13 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CWP No. 3818 of 2019 -2Perusal of the same would show that the complaints filed by the petitioner i.e. Complaint No.2219201/6-17, 1320201/7-18, 2722/2017-18 and 4892/2017-18 stand already decided.
In view of aforesaid facts, no further adjournment can be granted in this writ petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
12.07.2022 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) Jyoti Sharma JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No
2. Whether reportable :
Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2022.07.13 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment