Parminder Singh v. UOI And Others

CWP-28888-2024 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-28888-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.02.2025 Parminder Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

None for the petitioner.

Ms. Shweta Nahata, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondent(s)-Union of India.

*** HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) The instant Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondents No.1 and 2 to re-issue the passport to the petitioner.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)- Union of India submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the passport already stands issued to the petitioner. 3.

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous however, in case, the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)-Union of India is not correct, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of this writ petition. 4.

All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 20.02.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.02.21 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh