Rajesh Bansal v. Priyanka Mehtani

024 (O&M) COCP No.3923 of 20 IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA RAJESH BANS Vs PRIYANKA ME COCP No Date of D o.3923 of 2024 (O&M) Decision: 18.10.2024 SAL ......Petitioner ....Respondent EHTANI CORAM: HON

Present:

Mr for Mr for HARKESH MA N'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKES SH MANUJA . Parveen Gupta, Advocate the petitioner.

. Karan Gupta, Advocate the respondent.

**** ANUJA, J. (Oral) 1.

Lea arned counsel for the petitioner r submits that the order qua wh hich the contempt p proceedings have been sough ht, stands complied with by the respondent by w way of passing a speaking order r by the Regional Passport Offic cer, Regional Passpo ort Office, Chandigarh on 17.10 0.2024, therefore, he does not pr ress the present petit ion, however, with liberty to cha allenge the said order, as per law w.

2.

Dis smissed as not pressed with the a aforesaid liberty.

October 18, 20 Atik (HA ARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Wh Wh hether speaking/reasoned Yes hether reportable Yes s/No s/No MOHMED ATIK 2024.10.19 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment