Mohit @ Manpreet v. State Of Haryana
!"#
#$%&% ' ((
) * ( +
+ +
!!!!
+ + , ( -.!/0 "
#
$%& ' '
( #
# )#
*+ ,$- ,.
./ ,.01
%1&23%$+' ,/ (
#
3 4 566
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody for the last about 3 years and eight out of total 15 cited prosecution witnesses have been examined. )( the trial of the case may take long time and therefore the petitioner may be considered for the grant of regular bail.
On the other hand, #
has submitted, that so far as the custody part is concerned, the same is correct but the petitioner is not entitled for grant of bail in view of the fact that the petitioner is involved in one more case of similar nature and apart from the same, earlier the DINESH 2023.04.01 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court for one month on the ground that the mother of the petitioner was undergoing some surgery but after the expiry of the period of interim bail he did not surrender and rather warrants of arrest were issued against him and therefore this Court had dismissed the bail petition of the petitioner on 28.01.2021 vide Annexure P-8. She submitted that the petitioner remained absconded for long time and thereafter he was arrested in pursuance of the arrest warrants issued against him and in )#
( )
# )# I have heard learned counsel for the parties. It is a third bail petition filed by the petitioner. This Court had earlier granted interim bail to the petitioner to which he jumped and vide Annexure P-8 his bail petition was dismissed. The apprehension expressed by l
# )#
( )
)
In view of the aforesaid conduct of the petitioner, the petitioner is not entitled for the grant of regular bail. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed
)
)
## )
(
#(
-
+ + 0
!.$1 , 8
9 :
;
8
)#
:
;
DINESH 2023.04.01 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document