Gurvinder Singh And Another v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2024:PHHC:015040 CRM-M-55596-2023 Date of decision: February 5th, 2024 Gurvinder Singh and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Lakhwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Petitioners are seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.305 dated 08.10.2023 under Sections 332, 353, 186 and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC registered at Police Station City Ratia, District Fatehabad. 2.

Vide order dated 06.11.2023, the petitioners had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under:- "Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the occurrence in question took place on account of a trivial dispute with respect to the parking of the buses. He submits that in the occurrence in question, both the sides received injuries at the hands of each other. In support, learned counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to the MLR dated 08.10.2023 which has been annexed as Annexure P-2. Learned counsel further submits that the injuries attributed to the petitioners on the person of the complainant as well PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.02.05 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh

CRM-M-55596-2023 -2as the conductor of the bus were also opined to be simple in nature."

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of order dated 06.11.2023, the petitioners have joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioners having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. She on further instructions submits that the petitioners are not required for further investigation much less for their custodial interrogation.

5.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 06.11.2023, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

February 5th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.02.05 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh