Ramesh v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No.49672 of 2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.49672 of 2019 Date of Decision:26.02.2020 Ramesh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

-.- JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.136 dated 04.11.2019 registered under Section 506 IPC and Section 10 of POCSO Act, 2012 at Police Station Women Narnaul, District Mahendergarh.

Learned counsel for the petitioner herein would contend that the petitioner, who is in custody since 05.11.2019 has been falsely implicated in the present case. Now the investigation is complete and statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded, therefore, petitioner is entitled for concession of bail.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from LASI Suresh Kumari admits to the factum of recording statement of the prosecutrix, however, opposes the bail application. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Since no further investigation is required and statement of prosecutrix has already been recorded, no useful purpose would be served in PANKAJ KUMAR 2020.02.27 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.49672 of 2019 -2keeping the petitioner behind the bars. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail on execution of adequate personal bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. However, any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on merits of the case. (JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE February 26, 2020 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2020.02.27 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document