← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/56326/2023allowed

Manoj v. State Of Haryana

2023-11-16Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 16.11.2023 MANOJ ....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

Mr. Pardeep Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Sehrawat, DAG, Haryana.

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.49, dated 28.02.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 149, 201, 323, 325, 307, 379-B, 452, 506 of the IPC & 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Tigaon, District Faridabad (Haryana).

2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, it has been alleged as under :

        !"# $%&' % # () *# 

   +,, " -&,%, .#%/"# %01#(   # ( %"

"#(

2 #  "#."/

#,3 & # ##  ./" 

. .#"#,4( #%%5 #(   # $6 7& ## ( 5 4% #  ( 1 06 #(  "# (5# %4#( 5# %*&2#(0   # ( % "

"#(  /% .#2#8#.



 # 2#"#,2 % 7&%. #.

 # %/(%/  "# 2 %.#2#/   #

*&2 4%(   /%.2" % #& .%/.(9#%    #"%# %/.(.#2#  %.22#

&"#    2  ./  %/  .(:#        

#,

 ( ###( ./( %#& 2 %,;#( %0#.((;9 ##( /6%#($% %#(/ 

#( $"#(# 1#1"

/ "

 (7 $%#( #% "##   "# % 6 %#&59(  % ( % ( 2 %..  % 0 6 #&7 < 5*..6"# <   &&  .#  %  .  :  2.    #  6 % &&  "

"# "#."/

#"  &;#" 2# #&&,= 3.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the allegations as levelled in the FIR are taken on their face value it is evident that though the petitioner is being projected as the cause of dispute but he himself never participated in the same. Further reliance is being placed upon order dated 20th of October, 2023 passed in CRM-M No.52528 of 2023 whereby coaccused namely Satish stands admitted to bail observing as under : "xxxxx

  ;   "#  (    &  #"%#     6#  /# #"

  .#( . . & ##"((  1"

#, $# & "&

   ,-,&##    . /<"# %/06 # # %  , ;  "#( &  #"%# 6##%&"# /(&  &  #&"6%#"

 "#& ."

 ( , ("

 #"%#2&6.

1"

# 6"#  (# 22 .#      1"

#     #%&    "

    &

# 6# % ,  & # "# /#, ,,       "#  (    %& 6%/&&##&,#"%### .     6%  #  #"((     1"

#  "

  # ( "

  ##&(  " &

..##(06  "# . %& /

 

06 , ;  "###&&# &

#"%    2&    6.    # "###  (   #& #%  %##,

6

  "#( & # 6  " 

#(#, + 6

6##"

#(6.

6#  /# #"

   # #& # 2&6.  #"((  / & & #&#. ,

& # 

   # #("

#'#"

/ #     ##(  (    ;

, 

  "

'*"/  0#    ,888= 4.

Ld. State Counsel as well as Ms. Ruby Kaur, Advocate appearing for the complaint are not in position to dispute the aforesaid

factual assertions made by counsel for the petitioner which are based on record.

5.

I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through records of the case.

6.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, keeping in view the incarceration suffered by the petitioner and the allegations levelled against him, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. 7.

Needless to say that anything observed hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. November 16, 2023 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No