← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/49503/2025allowed

Amarjot Alias Sam v. State Of Punjab

2026-03-17Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth4 pages

        

 !"

#$ $ % &'() *'+ ',-'& .$$$ * * !

( / (,0, -*'*  10!)'2 .$$$ ,3 !

!* "  45$- - /- -  

  

  

    

 

   

 

!!!!

- /- -6$ "

        #$% &' %(%)  

 

  *  + 

   

 , -  .

  /

'&  1 * * !

( 7,8  

$ '*

-

* !7,8  +

-*'* !

    



)1  

"22 ($ (3 %(%4 ))"5#6 )(4 &' 7 8 &  

  %

      * *   (4 (2 %(%4 "1.

xxxx 2.

On oral request made by counsel for the petitioner, complainant namely Yogi Nair, son of Ralla Ram Nair, resident of Krishan Nagar, Batala, District Gurdaspur, (Mobile No.9815144141), is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.2 in the present case.

Let amended memo of parties be filed by counsel for the petitioner in the Registry, within a period of two days from today, without moving any separate application.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that case of the complainant/respondent No.2, as set out in the FIR, is that petitioner had earlier taken the second floor of the building on rent, which he has since vacated about a month ago. However, it is alleged that petitioner has now broken the locks of the premises and taken away certain items, i.e. an air conditioner, a water machine, and two ceiling fans. It is submitted that FIR does not disclose, how complainant/respondent No.2 has attributed the alleged act of theft specifically to the petitioner, or what material supports such a conclusion.

4.

Further submits that case appears to be false and motivated.Nevertheless, petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation and cooperate with the authorities, provided he is granted protection from arrest by this Court. Thus, prays for grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present case.

5.

Notice of motion.

6.

On advance notice, Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent < State, and seeks some time to file status report in the matter. 7.

Adjourned to 06.11.2025.

Let respondent No.2/complainant be served through SHO concerned for the next date of hearing fixed before this Court. 8.

Meanwhile, petitioner shall not be arrested However, issue of joining of investigation by the petitioner would be examined on the next date of hearing, after reviewing the status report, which is yet to be filed by learned State counsel."

) 9 :  / * 

     

 

 

  

 

  

       

        *      8         77;

  *  

  

 

           # 9         *

      

 -       

    / + <:



        (4 (2 %(%4

 





           7  



*    

   * * *+    -  

      

   

 

 

 9 ;  

 

 

    *   #$%5%6 &' %(%) =*   

  

 * >  



 

 

    *   #$%5%6 &' %(%)

 &    *      - 

  7    9* *  



        

   -

     

     * +   7

     7- /- -8    '( 9 #6 %   ?  +@. -:



? .  -: