Chandigarh Enclave Residents Welfare Association v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24797-2023 Date of Decision : February 13, 2025 CHANDIGARH ENCLAVE RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Arjun Shukla, Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, D.A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate for the respondents No.2 and 3.

Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.4.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

The learned counsels appearing for the respondents No.2&3, and, for the respondent No.4, have filed their respective replies, which are taken on record.

2.

During the course of arguments, a consensus has been arrived at between the petitioner and the respondents No.2 and 3 that, in the event of the petitioner applying for temporary electricity connection for the common area, the respondents No.2 and 3 will, without insisting for the occupation certificate but on completion of all other requisite formalities, provide temporary electricity connection to it. DEVINDER YADAV 2025.02.15 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-24797-2023 3.

It would also be apt to record here that, a civil suit has also been filed by the respondent No.4, wherein, a declaration has been sought that, the petitioner be declared to be legally bound to maintain and to look after the day to day affairs of its Society.

4.

In view of the consensus (supra), no further direction is required to be passed upon the instant writ petition. Hence, the instant writ petition is closed.

5.

Disposed of accordingly.

(KULDEEP TIWARI) February 13, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.02.15 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment