High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR(F)/986/2019dismissed

Nirmala v. Mange Ram

2024-11-181 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F) No. 986 of 2019 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- 18.11.2024 Nirmala

...Petitioner

Versus

Mange Ram

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. J.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunny Tyagi, Advocate for respondent.

*** SUMEET GOEL , J.

(Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent are ad idem that the parties are living together. In view of this, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to revive the same in case need arises.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to revive the petition on showing sufficient cause.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 18.11.2024 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2024.11.18 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment