Sunil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another
_________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Sr. No.245 CRM-M-58762-2022 Date of Decision: 11.05.2023 SUNIL KUMAR .... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.
**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The learned State counsel has filed reply dated 30.01.2023 by way of an affidavit of Sh. Vipin Kadian, HPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rai, Sonipat on behalf of respondent-State and the same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. However, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed in default for want of non-prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE 11.05.2023 M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No MAMTA 2023.05.15 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment