Satnam Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR

CRM-M-52333-2024
























IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52333-2024 Date of decision: 26.11.2024 SATNAM SINGH AND ANR

...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT

Present:

Ms. Abhilasha Kainth, Advocate for Mr. B. S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Deepinder Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Utkarsh Madaan, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of an FIR No. 196, dated 03.09.2022, registered under Sections 186, 506 and 34 of IPC, Police Station City Moga, District Moga (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of affidavit/compromise (Annexure P-2). Vide order dated 22.10.2024 while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the affidavit/compromise (Annexure P-2).

Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga and got their statements recorded. Report dated MOHIT 2024.11.29 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-52333-2024























13.11.2024 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioner(s).

Resultantly, FIR No. 196, dated 03.09.2022, registered under Sections 186, 506 and 34 of IPC, Police Station City Moga, District Moga (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner(s).

(N. S. SHEKHAWAT) 26.11.2024 JUDGE M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MOHIT 2024.11.29 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment