Harish Kumar Sharma v. Anjli

8.

It is settled law that while deciding the application for maintenance pendent lite, the Court has to see the parallel resources of the parties. In the instant case, the monthly income of the appellant-husband as noticed above, is not in dispute and there is no material or document on record to held that the respondent-wife has any source of income. 9.

We find that the impugned order passed by the learned Family Court does not suffer from any illegality. Merely because the appellant-husband is also taking care of his other two children statedly born from his previous marriage, is no ground to deny the legal right of the respondent-wife.

10.

In view of the above we do not find that the impugned order passed by the learned Family Court is perverse or illegal. 11.

No other point has been urged.

12.

In view of the above, finding no merit in the present appeal, the same is hereby dismissed.

13.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.