Gaurav Gupta v. Kavita Hooda

107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 28947 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.04.2026 Gaurav Gupta ....Petitioner vs.

Kavita Hooda and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Gaurav Gupta, petitioner in person (through VC) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking stay of proceedings pending before trial Court. He is further seeking declaration that respondent No.1 and 2 are neither eligible to be heard nor any relief in view of findings of the Court that they have suppressed material facts.

2.

The petitioner's wife and minor son filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before Family Court, Rohtak claiming that they have no source of income. There was suppression of facts. The respondent is gainfully employed. The petitioner revealed the truth in his written statement dated 03.03.2021. The petitioner preferred CWP-22434-2024 before this Court seeking declaration that respondent has approached trial Court with unclean hands. She has abused process of law. This Court dismissed said petition vide order dated 22.10.2024. The trial Court vide order dated 21.04.2025 observed that claimant has not disclosed truthfully, therefore, is PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.04.08 04:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No. 28947 of 2025 -2not entitled to maintenance. Despite said findings, respondents were allowed to participate in proceedings before trial Court. 3.

The petitioner who is present in person submits that respondents No. 1 and 2 on account of suppression of facts as per law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India are not eligible to be heard by Family Court.

4.

The matter is pending before Family Court and prayer made by petitioner seems to be very strange. It is Family Court which will consider applicable law and rights of the parties. There is no question for this Court to interfere at the behest of petitioner.

5.

Dismissed.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 08.04.2026 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.04.08 04:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document