Yamin v. State Of Haryana And ORS

229-1 CRM-A-2721-MA-2018 YAMIN VS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Present:

Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. S.S. JaƩan, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5.

*** CRM-A-2721-MA-2018 Counsel for the complainant submits that he has a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for convicƟon of the private respondents No.3 to 5 and convicƟon of respondent No.2 under SecƟon 302 IPC. There is no appreciaƟon of evidence in judgment dated 25.01.2016/04.02.2016. Counsel appearing for the private respondents oppose the prayer. Leave to appeal granted.

Registry to assign number to appeal.

Main appeal Heard.

AdmiƩed.

The accused i.e. private respondents No. 3 to 5 to execute a bond for aƩendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. There is no need to furnish bonds by respondent No.2 as his appeal against convicƟon is already pending before this Court.

Given above, the accused i.e. private respondents No. 2 to 5 shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty Five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the saƟsfacƟon of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepƟng the sureƟes, the concerned Court must saƟsfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing them before the Court.

SANGEETA 2025.12.02 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-A-2721-MA-20181 -2The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all sƟpulaƟons, terms, and condiƟons of this order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of private respondents No. 3 to 5 to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and aƩest it to be a true copy. In case the aƩesƟng officer wants to verify the authenƟcity, such an officer can also verify its authenƟcity and may download and use the downloaded copy for aƩesƟng bonds. To be heard along with CRA-S-772-SB-2016.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) December 01, 2025 JUDGE Sangeeta SANGEETA 2025.12.02 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document