Satvender @ Satender v. State Of Haryana And ANR
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of Decision:- 26.11.2025 Satvender @ Satender ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Sankalp Gehlawat, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Gurdeep Singh Nehra, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
***** SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral) 1.
Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.237 dated 24.08.2025 registered under Sections 351(2), 287, 126, 115 of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act, at Police Station Badli, District Jhajjar, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 04.09.2025 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. 2.
The above stated FIR was registered on the statement of the complainant/respondent No.2.
3.
On notice of motion, respondent No.2 appeared through his counsel and pleaded that he has no objection if the FIR in this case is quashed
( 2 ) on the basis of the aforesaid compromise, which has been effected between the parties.
4.
Reply by way of an affidavit of Pardeep Kumar, HPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, filed by learned State counsel, is taken on record.
5.
During the course of preliminary hearing, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate was directed to record the statements of all the concerned parties with regard to genuineness and validity or otherwise of the aforesaid compromise.
6.
In compliance thereof, report from the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bahadurgarh, along with statements of the parties has been received, in which, it is mentioned that the compromise is genuine and there was no undue influence or coercion from any side. 7.
This Court has heard learned counsel for the parties. 8.
Learned counsel for the petitioner and for respondent No.2 are ad idem that in view of the settlement effected between the parties, the present petition deserves to be accepted. It has also come on record that the aforesaid compromise is genuine and the parties effected the same without any undue influence or coercion.
9.
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated further in the present case. Thus, continuation of the criminal proceedings between the parties would be a futile exercise and sheer wastage of time of the Court and thus, amounts to abuse of process of law.
( 3 ) 10.
For the reasons afore-stated and having regard to the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Five Judges Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, this petition is allowed and FIR No.237 dated 24.08.2025 registered under Sections 351(2), 287, 126, 115 of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act, at Police Station Badli, District Jhajjar, and all the subsequent proceedings are hereby quashed qua the petitioners, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as cost, to be deposited with Haryana State Legal Services Authority, Panchkula, in account No.11901238123, IFSC Code:SBIN00004172, State Bank of India, Sector-14, Panchkula. 11.
Receipt regarding deposit of aforesaid cost be produced before Court concerned. It is made clear that if cost is not deposited within one month i.e. upto 26.12.2025, present petition shall be deemed to be dismissed. ( SUBHAS MEHLA ) 26.11.2025 JUDGE Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No