← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/50660/2025dismissed

Sarajudeen v. State Of Haryana

2025-09-23Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi10 pages

            



 ! "# !$%&%"'()*) 

     

     +, ) - - - 

   

   



  

 

!

"#   - - .

)

/0   

       %&'  ()

'*'+  

 !      ,- 

     ./ ) +0   '0 *& '*'1    2 

 !  

-     (  "  

'

 ,   

  

 - 3    - 3

 -4 -  05#(      , '+5&   0& *5 '*'1  -

 , +%55  0&2" ('*'1   '0 *5 '*'1 

   

    -   !-    4   (  "!       !  ''    &     

  05#(   3 6  - 47   3   7    ) '8& - 9 -  3  

   

     ,

  3

   -! 3

 64!

  

   !

 !



 - 

    ./ ) '%   01 *0 '*'1    +0&:%;  +05:'; 

 (   )   :();

'*'+ 3 !    <, 9  !

 ,  7     !

 

   = *& *5 '*'1 /  7  

-    <, 9  --!- >  7     = 0* *5 '*'1  7    /  7  

 -   

 --!-   '

1* ***  6 !     !        !

 ,? -  @

- < 3!

   !   

3 

/  7      !   - !     ,

   ( 

 -

  



      3    !   ! /  7       3 3 

  - "  #-  -   4   ( :(;

 >-  -

 ) %+'2 ) (   '+ *2 '*'1 -  !       2 

     

08&& 3  

!

-

 ) 011&2 -  +&8'*'1   *2 *& '*'1   ./ ) +0   '0 *& '*'1

   ! /  7     2 

     

08&& 3 !     A  ( 

 +

"!

    !   '+ *& '*'1

    - 7   3      0&* 

( )   =

  

      0&+ ( )   3   ,

  B/

 = '1 *& '*'1 7   3   ,

B  

     -  ! 

%

= *1 *8 '*'1 - 7      =

=  0' # ,-   :-;    

   0* *5 '*'1



  05#(    !

  !

  - ,

        -    5+:%; 

 ( 

'*'+

"!

    !  3 

./ )

'%'*'1 3 !-- !  ,   - ,   7

    -   (    -  #-6 . -     - 4    0% *5 1&*4 -

> !  - ++55&8 ,  7

, 

-

/  3

  ! !        7  *& *5 '*'1 "!   0* *5 '*'1

 --! ,,    

   3 

/    '

1* ***4  6 !  ,-   

 

 - - 

    

   , -- -   

   / 

 ./ ) '%   01 *0 '*'1    +0&:%;  +05:';  () '*'+

-    <, 9  3 !  !

, 

- 

   3

  ! !   

  

  4 7

, 

 - 47   3    *& *5 '*'1  



 -    7  ,  

 -   ! 

  4 7 3   ,

 /--@ !    

 -   -   -- --!!

 , 3 -     

D    

 3  ,

 -    44-3    -   !

   3     3

 -! 3   ,

 ,@ -

  ./  , !  3

 -  ,     ,   --!     , 3

 - 

   3 

    --!- ! --!- !    $>!

 --!   , 

    -- ,    ,

     - 

   ! 3- ,  

     !

  

 $- 

      3--!

 

  !       -

   - 

       ,-

 - - 

  

 

 

 -  -   02 *8 '*'1 3  >    - !



  -

  

   3

  ! !   

  !  !

, 

 -

/           !

 -  @

-   ,

        '

1* ***4    

  :64//; 

 

 -  

     prima facie  ,-  

  !    , >    -! -

  -

  -  !  

     - @ 



     -,-  , 

&

/  

 - - 

  

 ?,-   

   



              !

 -

- ,   -  !  3  @ ,  - -  ,  !  !     ,-   

 

!



!

     ,- -      

 prima facie  !

    - 6  

 !    ,-34 "It may be true, as pointed out by learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1, that charge sheet has already been filed. It will be unfair to presume on our part that the Investigating Officer does not require Respondent No.1 for custodial interrogation for the purpose of further investigation. Be that as it may, even assuming it a case where Respondent No.1 is not required for custodial interrogation, we are satisfied that the High Court ought not to have granted discretionary relief of anticipatory bail.

We are dealing with a matter wherein the original complainant (appellant herein) has come before this Court praying that the anticipatory bail granted by the High Court to the accused should be cancelled. To put it in other words, the complainant says that the High Court wrongly exercised its discretion while granting anticipatory bail to the accused in a very serious crime like POCSO and, therefore, the order passed by the High Court granting anticipatory bail to the accused should be quashed and set aside. " # $% # &

 

! '

( %$

% $%%  )  & ) $(

 % $%  

%)% 

*

 !



+%

! $% # & # & ) 

 ,

   % &  

% $%$ % %+ '  + % $ +% $% 



%)%  

% &#  % $%!     % '%

&  )%% ) % % )  $% # &  % 



%)% $ & % %+ 

(  $ % & $%

 %) ' %

) %  '

$ )   $% 

-) $% # &  ,

# & # $   '$  $%  

%)% %+  $$

# % &

*

! &  %  %      +$ $ )  $$

%

& )%

% %(

%%-



%

& ) 

$% # &  , +   +%

% )   $%    )  $% # &  $% %

$%

   +$ $   )  $$

 ,

+

!  

%+  %++ $ %

&

%%-

%  %) '   (

# %+    %  

%)% $ & % %+  ) %  %

 $%  

%)% .%'

(

!

(  + $% 



%)%  %

*

%  

! &# 

+! $% &  ) % % )  $% # & ."

0*

/ / (

 0 :;

 E,- 



-  4 "21. The parameters for grant of anticipatory bail in a serious offence like corruption are required to be satisfied. Anticipatory bail can be granted only in exceptional circumstances where the Court is prima facie of the view that the applicant has been falsely enroped in the crime or the allegations are politically motivated or are frivolous. So far as the case at hand is concerned, it cannot be said that

 any exceptional circumstances have been made out by the petitioner accused for grant of anticipatory bail and there is no frivolity in the prosecution.

22. In the aforesaid context, we may refer to a pronouncement in Central Bureau of Investigation v. V. Vijay Sai Reddy reported in (2013) 7 Scale 15, wherein this Court expressed thus:

"28. While granting bail, the court has to keep in mind the nature of accusation, the nature of evidence in support thereof, the severity of the punishment which conviction will entail, the character of the accused, circumstances which are peculiar to the accused, reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the trial, reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tampered with, the larger interests of the public/State and other similar considerations. It has also to be kept in mind that for the purpose of granting bail, the Legislature has used the words "reasonable grounds for believing" instead of "the evidence" which means the Court dealing with the grant of bail can only satisfy it as to whether there is a genuine case against the accused and that the prosecution will be able to produce prima facie evidence in support of the charge. It is not expected, at this stage, to have the evidence establishing the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt."

(Emphasis supplied)

23. The presumption of innocence, by itself, cannot be the sole consideration for grant of anticipatory bail. The presumption of innocence is one of the considerations, which the court should keep in mind while considering the plea for anticipatory bail. The salutary rule is to balance the cause of

 the accused and the cause of public justice. Over solicitous homage to the accused's liberty can, sometimes, defeat the cause of public justice.

24. If liberty is to be denied to an accused to ensure corruption free society, then the courts should not hesitate in denying such liberty. Where overwhelming considerations in the nature aforesaid require denial of anticipatory bail, it has to be denied. It is altogether a different thing to say that once the investigation is over and charge sheet is filed, the court may consider to grant regular bail to a public servant

accused of indulging in corruption.

25. Avarice is a common frailty of mankind and Robert Walpole's famous pronouncement that all men have their price, notwithstanding the unsavoury cynicism that it suggests, is not very far from truth. As far back as more than two centuries ago, it was Burke who cautioned: "Among a people generally corrupt, liberty cannot last long". In more recent years, Romain Rolland lamented that France fell because there was corruption without indignation. Corruption has, in it, very dangerous potentialities. Corruption, a word of wide connotation has, in respect of almost all the spheres of our day to day life, all the world over, the limited meaning of allowing decisions and actions to be influenced not by the rights or wrongs of a case but by the prospects of monetary gains or other selfish considerations.

26. If even a fraction of what was the vox pupuli about the magnitude of corruption to be true, then it would not be far removed from the truth, that it is the rampant corruption indulged in with impunity by highly placed persons that has led to economic unrest in this country. If one is asked to name

  one sole factor that effectively arrested the progress of our society to prosperity, undeniably it is corruption. If the society in a developing country faces a menace greater than even the one from the hired assassins to its law and order, then that is from the corrupt elements at the higher echelons of the Government and of the political parties." :9  -;

/  ' ) :;

 E,-  

-  4 F9. It is well settled law, and reaffirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Devinder Kumar Bansal v. State of Punjab, 2025 INSC 320 that anticipatory bail in cases involving offences under the Corruption Act is to be granted only in the rarest of rare circumstances. The court is required to be prima facie satisfied either of false implication, political vendetta, or manifest frivolity in the complaint.

10. In the present case, no such circumstances are made out. On the contrary, the specific allegations supported by preliminary material including the trap proceedings, indicate a prima facie involvement of the petitioner in the commission of the alleged offence.

11. In view of the seriousness of the allegations, the position of trust held by the petitioner as a public servant, and the need for thorough investigation through custodial interrogation, this Court finds no ground to extend the extraordinary concession of the anticipatory bail to the petitioner."

(Emphasis supplied)

  0'



-

   3

  ! !   

 !

, 

 -

  :6 4//;

3- prima facie  ,-

   3 ! --!- !      

  !

      3

3- - 

 -  @

- 

   - ,    3    ,    -

 !  

     

!

 !!

    , -- -       ,-@ -  -   

 --!  --- !

  - - ,- / 

     prima facie  ,-   

  !   , >    -! -  -

  -  !  

     - @

0+

/ 3 

 ,   /      

   

    

0%

3   -

 ,   

   - 

    !

 ,- -   

 $-

       

 

 

 , 

   - ,  -  ,   ,  

 ! -  :;

   --      !-

-!1 !23!/ (. 

- -  >  

 >!  G)

  ,-  G)