Sumit Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-29164-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.12.2022 Sumit Kumar .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present:
Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl.A.G., Haryana.
***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petition herein, inter alia, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to send the name of the petitioner to respondent No.5-Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam Limited in compliance with office letter dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P-1). 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has also submitted representation dated 12.12.2022 (Annexure P-2), but the same has not been adverted by the respondents till date.
3.
On advance service, learned State counsel appears and submits that a decision will be taken by the competent authority, either way, on the pending representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. 4.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner also seeks decision on the pending representation, as suggested by learned State counsel. ASHISH 2022.12.20 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-29164-2022 (O&M) -25.
Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.
6.
Without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority (respondent No.4) to look into the pending representation dated 12.12.2022 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and pass an administrative order, giving reasons thereof, in accordance with law.
7.
Let the needful be done as expeditiously as possible. (ARUN MONGA) JUDGE December 19, 2022 ashish Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No ASHISH 2022.12.20 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document