Monika v. Rajmal And Others

2024:PHHC:031282 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 6045 of 2022 Date of Decision: 05.03.2024 Monika ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Rajmal and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Pankaj Middha, Mr. Karamjeet Singh, Advocates for respondent No.4 and 5.

Mr. J.S.Santewal, Advocate for respondent No.6 and 7.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

This revision petition has been filed against the ad interim interlocutory order passed by the Trial Court while refusing to grant interim injunction in favour of the petitioner (plaintiff). 2.

The learned counsel representing the parties are ad idem that the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC") filed by the petitioner is yet to be decided.

3.

Keeping in view the facts of the case, it is considered appropriate to direct the Trial Court to decide the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC within a period of one month at the first instance. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.03.11 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2024:PHHC:031282 Civil Revision No. 6045 of 2022 4.

With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge March 05, 2024 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.03.11 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document