Sunil Alias Rahul v. State Of Haryana
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 28.01.2025 SUNIL ALIAS RAHUL ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Ms. Aarti Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh, A.A.G. Haryana.
Mr. Deepak K. Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 1.
Learned State counsel has filed the affidavit of Director General of Police, Haryana dated 27.01.2025, which is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.
Arguments heard.
3.
By way of present petition filed unde
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
!
"# $"%$
&' ()* + , - -
. ( / / 0 /
-2- 0 / "
/1 / / 2 / 34 / 04 / 0 (0 $ '$ Learned State counsel while referring to para 3 (b) of the aforesaid affidavit filed by Director General of Police, Haryana and 3 (0 / has stated that the petitioner has been found innocent during investigation / 05 ( 34 / / 5 ( (/ 34 $ #$ - $ 6$ , 4/(/ 4 "
/(7 4 7 !
!"
#
%%&'(&()
)*
+
, $
"(
#
-+
-3-
!"
&.&/(&()
!"
&/&/(&()
'+ 0
0
1
.0 2
0
#
3#
(%&/(&()
# 0
2
# 4
#
#
&.&/(&()5
/!
6
7
8
#
1 &
# %&
9
,
0
9 0
)4(:(;<=
(&( %%* %)&%(&(->
8 4 37/30 0 / ( / / / 2 / 34 5 / "
/1 0
-44 3 "
/ (0 2 34
)*$// 2 34 7/ 5 (7( 7 (/3 34 49(((/ / :/7 07//3 7 ( / 7 7 3 / 7/ 0 (/1$ %$ ;/ 7 $ (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 28.01.2025 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No