Karn Khanna And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another
CRM-M-50916-2025
! "! # KARN KHANNA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER $ %&$ ! '( '! ) ***** ! "#$ % &' ( ! ) * +++++ ( '! )+!, -./ , ( -*./ ( " ! !
*0*1 2 " 34 ,5* 0106*0*- ,,-*.718-9/*0*1 *7
,5-5 " $ )(:" ;" $"<$$ = 2 " =
,007*0*-8 > *9
* * ? 34 2 = " !$ @ " $$""0106*0*- = 710 $ < "= " !
" $A % $(= % " ( $ <" $ $< !A %= =("" " 4 "2 $=< $B * $
@ = !"$
=$< $$( $ " 34 1 4 < < =$ = <= $ =$( $ 4 = "
<
<$$<(
C ,,05*0*- = ) $:"8%9 ):;" :"
17-,-,0*0*-? $ >
!"!# ! #
#$ %&$"'#(
)$ ! " &
* + +$ #$ , - ./ // /
0 // 1
. / $ #23+ $
/
1 4 *
3
-
// ,
567
- 08- 0/ 567$ 0 -
-
- * 8 / * - 8- 0 0
0 //
8/ /$
8 /
/ / ! ! # - A $
"
( =@ $ "
6.
! ) appears on behalf of respondent No. 2 and reiterate the settlement and their concurrence to the quashing of the FIR alongwith all the other consequential proceedings. 7 ?'D=$ )
$ $" =$ 1*0 ) )
= $$( '") $$2 $ =( > " < C.*) ) "$( $ $( $ ?) $ < =>
C
= " ($ " =2 = '< < $( $ =$ =@ <$ $ '") (2 @
(< @ $? $ >
4. Now, the question before this Court is whether this Court can compound the offences under Sections 326 and 307 of the IPC which are non-compoundable. Needless to say that offences which are non-compoundable cannot be compounded by the court. Courts draw the power of compounding offences from Section 320 of the Code. The said provision has to be strictly followed (Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 : 2012(4) Recent Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 549 : (2012)10 SCC 303). However, in a given case, the High Court can quash a criminal proceeding in exercise of its power under section 482 of the Code having regard to the fact that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and the victim has no objection, even though the offences are non-compoundable.
In which cases the High Court can exercise its discretion to quash the proceedings will depend on facts and circumstances of each case. Offences which involve moral turpitude, grave offences like rape, murder etc. cannot be effaced by quashing the proceedings because that will have harmful effect on the society. Such offences cannot be said to be restricted to two individuals or two groups. If such offences are quashed, it may send wrong signal to the society.
- bring about peace and would secure ends of justice, it should not hesitate to quash them. In such cases, the prosecution becomes a lame prosecution. Pursuing such a lame prosecution would be waste of time and energy. That will also unsettle the compromise and obstruct restoration of peace.
8 = $$<" $ " $" < -*./*0*1 4 =$ ==($ ) $ :" 8 % 9 $ ) : $ " ;" :" $ $(< " = < ( $
= ?$$" 34
$ $ ( $ $
$
?
$$<" > " <
$
$ ? "=1.C0( $( $ $ $!$(
" $ $$ =$" ? 34 2 ( *0*-
6 $$
" " $( =$( $ < <$$< =$= (= "" $ @ <$ ( 2$$(=< ? 8 9$$" = " ( ! $$
( ( ! <$
!
) " 4 < =$ $ =< $ $!$(
E 2$( <$
$ " =$ <$ $( $ =$< " $=$@ $ 4$( 34 $$ " <$ =
$< @ <$= = =(2 " < =< 5 4 < ==() $:"8%9
):;" :" " " $ $ $<=(' =$ ) =@ $$<? 34 ,5*0106*0*- ,,- *.718-9/*0*1 *7
,5-5 "
7 $ )(:" ;" $$ 2$ " 2-3456 2 < ,007*0*-8 > *9 $$< ,( '! )/ + # 9 # !"F ; F # =$ ; F