Kuldip Singh And ANR v. Harjinder Singh

CRM-A-124-2023
 CRM-A-124-2023 Kuldip Singh and another vs. Harjinder Singh

Present:

Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate Mr. Fateh Sahota, Advocate and Ms. Avneet Kaur Mangat, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for the respondent.

***** CRM-A-124-2023 Counsel for the applicants submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2022 and they have a very good case on merit. Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondents.  Leave to appeal granted.

Counsel for the respondents submits that he be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistate. He undertakes to surrender before the majesty of Court as and when this Court would direct to do so or in case of reversal of the judgment.  Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by the respondent.

Main appeal Admit.

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue following the roster. It is clarified that the pendency of this appeal shall be in-consequential for any purpose.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 21.04.2026 anju rani ANJU RANI 2026.04.24 12:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh