Naveen Kumar v. State Of Haryana
!
"
#
$%
&' &((
) *+&%
+
!"#$%%!&'(!") * &!+,
#
, ($( %
% -.- /& 0
1 $ % '# *
% 23+
+ )
'#+
'
% *
% $ * %$
$* & 4. * % "
56 7
+* %%
!
8
# %!
* !#
& + 9 % **
' , 4 , $
%( *%( $( %53 %
%..-
(
%%
!
9& +
* !
# :
% *
$
'
%
$
) $
% $* % ' + )
+ % (
% #
+
) % *
% $ * $
%
%
%-.- %
$( %53%
!
9&3 )
(
% ( &
+ '
'
% $ %
%$
%
'
+
$* '
)
)%
%
% 9"
'
$* *
%)
)+$
$( %53
(
%%
!
9&)*%'
(' '
* ) - ;!
+&&<+"
# $ '
*
!
"
'
%
) ( *#% *
% $ * %$
+$ ) '
$
%
53
(
%%
!
9&3 8 3
% *
%$
%
%3
$$
53)
(
%% $$
$
) % *
% * %$
%
%
-.-&'
%'
+
$* *
% )
) This Court time and again has held that when the main case already stands disposed of, then the continuation of FIR and proceedings under Section 174-A of IPC on account of petitioner having been declared as proclaimed person would be nothing but an abuse of the process of law. 9 !+7
$( )
' % + *
53 )
(
% '
%
%$
'
)
'
* % %
#
$* *
%#'
)
)
%( %
!
9&3 **'
'
* )
# '
% )
*
'
)
$( )
* )
* %+ 53 %
..-
(
%%
!
9&3 +
* !
#*%(
%
%-.-$ %'#
*
%23+
-
+
'
) +
53) *%( %+
, % .
%%$ % * ,
*
=
!$
7(4
> 4 =
$
'* > 4