Tarsem Singh v. Kamal Kishore Yadav And ANR

024 (O&M) COCP No.4198 of 20 IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA TARSEM SING Vs KAMAL KISHO COCP No Date of D o.4198 of 2024 (O&M) Decision: 25.11.2024 GH ......Petitioner ....Respondents ORE YADAV AND ANR CORAM: HON

Present:

Mr Mr for Mr HARKESH MA N'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKES SH MANUJA . Jagdeep Kaur, Advocate for . G.S. Nahel, Advocate the petitioner.

. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Pun njab.

**** ANUJA, J. (Oral) 1.

Lea arned counsel for the petitioner r submits that the order qua wh hich the contempt p proceedings have been sough ht, stands complied with by the respondents, the erefore, she does not press the pre esent petition.

2.

Dis smissed as not pressed.

3.

Rul le stands discharged.

November 25, Atik (HA ARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Wh Wh hether speaking/reasoned Yes hether reportable Yes s/No s/No MOHMED ATIK 2024.11.26 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment