Susheel Kumar Singh Raghava v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M-53321-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53321-2024 Date of Decision: October 24, 2024 Susheel Kumar Singh Raghava ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Tanvir S.Grewal Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sumit Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Shiv K.Sharma, Advocate and Mr.Vipul Sachdeva, Advocate for the complainant.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) 1.

Present petition has been filed praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.298, dated 10.08.2024, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station City Sohna, District Gurugram (Annexure P-1).

2.

Learned senior counsel for the complainant has submitted that the offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act has been added in this FIR on 23.10.2024, which has not been mentioned in the petition. 3.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sunil Kumar, has affirmed the submission made by learned senior counsel for the complainant.

MEENU 2024.10.25 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-53321-2024 -24.

After hearing the statements of learned senior counsel for the complainant and the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh with better particulars.

5.

Allowed to do so.

6.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. October 24, 2024 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2024.10.25 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document