Devan Kapoor v. Pritpal Singh & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.9599 of 2018 Date of Decision: 30.05.2024 Devan Kapoor .....Revisionist-Petitioner.

Versus

Pritpal Singh (Babbu) and another .....Respondents.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate appearing as proxy counsel for Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.

None for the respondents.

***** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.(Oral) Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, as per the instructions from the arguing counsel, informs the Court that the instant revision-petition has become infructuous as the main Rent Petition, out of which it had arisen, has already been dismissed by the concerned Rent Controller vide order dated 09.03.2020, for its having been withdrawn and he prays that this revisionpetition may be disposed of accordingly. 2.

Resultantly, the revision-petition in hand is, hereby, disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 30, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether Reportable:

No YAG DUTT 2024.05.30 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment