Sultan Since Deceased Thr Lrs And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.13681 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.05.2022 Sultan (deceased) thr Lrs. and others ..Appellant (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL PresentMr. Sarvesh Malik, Advocate, Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate, Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate, Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate, Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate, Mr. Parveen Kaushik, Advocate, Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate, Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev K. Aggarwal, Advocate, Mr. Ojas Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Tejas Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate for Mr. S.P. Khatri, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana and Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. P.S. Saini, Advocate for HSIIDC.

*** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No.13254-CI of 2018 For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the application for bringing on record the legal representatives of Sultan (appellant No.1) is allowed, subject to all the just exceptions. Main Case For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No.4759
of 2018 titled as Om Parkash (deceased) thr. Lrs. and anr. vs. State of Haryana and ors.

17.05.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ASHOK KUMAR 2022.08.01 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document