Sunil Kumar @ Sheela And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR

CRM-M-53627-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53627-2024 Date of Decision: 26.11.2024 Sunil Kumar @ Sheela and others ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Anish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

***** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 04.04.2024 City Rampura Distt. Bathinda 380/457 IPC The petitioner arraigned as accused in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court for quashing of FIR by filing the present petition under Section 528 BNSS 2023.

2.

In compliance to the order dated 25.10.2024, the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Phul, has sent the report and observed as under:- Question of this Court Answer from the concerned Court Whether the court is satisfied with the No, as the compromise has been effected only genuineness of the compromise?

between complainant/respondent No.2 and three accused/petitioners and the other victims/aggrieved persons/complainants in this case are not party to the said compromise 3.

At this stage, petitioners' counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh.

ANJU RANI 2024.11.28 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-53627-2024  4.

Given above, petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that if the petitioner applies for copy of the report of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Phul, the concerned Court shall supply the same to the petitioner. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 26.11.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable?

No ANJU RANI 2024.11.28 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh