Vikas Bhatia v. Sunil Tati

RSA-341-2023 (O&M) - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA-341-2023 (O&M) Decided on : 20.10.2023 Vikas Bhatia . . . Appellant(s)

Versus

Sunil Tati . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Mandeep S. Sachdev, Advocate, for the appellant(s). **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that suit filed against the respondent (defendant) was decreed by the Ld. Trial Court, but appeal filed by the respondent (defendant) was allowed by reversing the findings of the Ld. Trial Court, to the effect that respondent (defendant) is a tenant in the premises in question.

Subsequent thereto, an ejectment petition was filed by the appellant herein (landlord), in which, there was a direction to pay the rent to the respondent, and on account of non-payment of rent, ejectment has been ordered.

Therefore, in the factual facts and circumstances, as recorded and explained hereabove, learned counsel submits that present appeal is worth for disposal, as being rendered infructuous.

Disposed of being rendered infructuous.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE October 20, 2023 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2023.10.20 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document