Sunil Yadav And Another v. The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram

C.W.P. No. 36144 of 2019 ..1..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 36144 of 2019 Date of Decision: 13th December, 2019 Sunil Yadav & Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram through its Chairman

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr.Anshu Chaudhary, Advocate, for Mr.Himanshu Raj, Advocate, for the petitioners.

DAYA CHAUDHARY (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has restricted his prayer to the extent that representation dated 15.10.2019 (Annexure P-2) is pending before the respondent but no action has been taken so far.

Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case the directions are issued to the respondent to take action on the pending representation dated 15.10.2019 (Annexure P-2).

Accordingly, keeping in view the limited prayer and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the pending representation dated 15.10.2019 (Annexure P-2) and take necessary action in accordance with SEEMA SHARMA 2019.12.17 13:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.W.P. No. 36144 of 2019 ..2..

law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of order and pass necessary order in accordance with law.

(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 13.12.2019.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No