Sml Labels India Private Limited v. State Of Haryana

IN TH HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGAR RH CWP-29358-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.10.2024 ) SML LABELS S (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED . . . . Petitioner r Vs.

ARYANA AND OTHERS STATE OF HA . . . . Respondents s **** HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ CORAM: H EEV PRAKASH SHARMA JAY VASHISTH **** Mr. Pranay Chitale, Advocate (thro Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner.

ough VC) and

Present

M M f M Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG G, Haryana.

**** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) SANJEEV P

1. The im ) mpugned order dated 28.12.202 23 was appealable in terms of f section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. How wever, the petitioner did not file e an appe eal against the said order.

2. Withou ut availing the remedy available to the petitioner, he has directly y approac ched this Court and that too after r a period of almost 10 months.

3. Writ Pe etition is dismissed accordingly.

4. All pen nding applications also stand disp posed of accordingly.

(SANJ JEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE October 28, 2 Mohit goyal er speaking/reasoned?

Y er reportable?

Y Yes/No Yes/No

1. Whethe

2. Whethe MOHIT GOYAL 2024.10.29 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document