Neha Devi And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023:PHHC:145434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-57655-2023 Date of Decision : November 16, 2023 NEHA DEVI AND ANR -Petitioners V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Chetan Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek issuance of directions upon the official respondent(s) to re-investigate the matter, on the premise, that despite the husband of petitioner No.1 receiving a sword injury on his head, yet the FIR was registered only for offences punishable under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 506 of the IPC.

2.

At the very outset, the learned State counsel, on instructions imparted to him by HC Ranbir Singh, has intimated this Court that, during the course of investigation, upon receipt of opinion from the doctor concerned, by the Investigating Officer concerned, offence under Section 325 of the IPC has already been added in the FIR concerned. 3.

In view of the hereinabove made intimation to this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant writ DEVINDER YADAV 2023.11.17 09:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-57655-2023 2023:PHHC:145434 petition, however, with liberty to access the appropriate forum/authority concerned, if his grievance yet survives or if any new grievance crops up. 4.

Leave granted.

5.

Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty (supra).

(KULDEEP TIWARI) November 16, 2023 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2023.11.17 09:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment