Ravinder @ Ravinder Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRWP No.10454 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.10454 of 2024 Date of Decision: 29.10.2024 Ravinder @ Ravinder Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 09.09.2008 Murthal, District Sonepat 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, 1860 The petitioner who is convict and is undergoing his sentence has come up before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 seeking emergency parole on the ground of attending marriage ceremony of his daughter fixed for 14.11.2024. 2.

State counsel on written instructions received from ASI-Sandeep has verified the factum of marriage of the daughter of the petitioner which is scheduled on 14.11.2024. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that on 21.10.2024, the petitioner had moved an application qua his parole through registered letter because the jail authorities refused to accept his application in person. He further submits that although he has challenged his conviction but at the time of final hearing before the Sessions Court, he had withdrawn the appeal on the ground that he was remorseful and wants to undergo his sentence. Given the conduct of the convict-petitioner and he being remorseful, this Court should be sympathetic towards him.

4. The petitioner through his counsel undertakes to comply with the order and not to delay his surrender in the concerned jail and in case he does so, in future it shall be taken Sonia Puri 2024.10.29 19:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP No.10454 of 2024 as a factor for parole or remission.

5.

Considering the factum of marriage of petitioner's daughter is established, the concerned Superintendent, Jail is directed to release the petitioner on parole immediately on his furnishing personal bonds in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to surrender back to the Jail from where he was released on 18.11.2024 by 12.00 PM. 6.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Petitioner and State can download this order and other relevant particulars from the official web page of this court and attest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

Petition is allowed to the extent mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 29.10.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Sonia Puri 2024.10.29 19:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document