Vijay Singh Yadav v. State Of Haryana And ANR
CWP-29664-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29664-2024 Date of Decision: 17.12.2024 Vijay Singh Yadav
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant full amount of medical reimbursement of the expenditure incurred on chronic disease of wife of the petitioner along with interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 23.07.2024, Annexure P-11, in terms of Policy dated 14.07.2020, for reimbursement of medical treatment from private empanelled hospitals, in a specified period.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Mr. Ravinder Singh Budhwar, Addl. AG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and submits that the pending representation shall be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously. PAYAL 2024.12.17 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-29664-2024 -25.
In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director General, Elementary School Education, to consider and decide the pending representation, dated 23.07.2024, in terms of Policy, dated 14.07.2020, for reimbursement of medical treatment from private empanelled hospitals, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to the benefits claimed, the same shall be released to him within a period of six weeks therefrom.
6.
In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 17.12.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.12.17 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document