Nikhil Raj And ORS v. National Institute Of Technology Kurukshetra And Others

CWP-35711-2019 -12023:PHHC:096818

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 220-4 CWP-35711-2019 Date of Decision : 28.07.2023 Nikhil Raj and others ......... Petitioners

Versus

National Institute of Technology and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

None for the petitioners.

Mr. A.S.Virk, Advocate for the respondents-NIT.

Mr.Anil Chawla, Advocate for the respondent-UOI.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of advertisement No.21/2017 (Annexure P-2) whereby the respondents have invited application for recruitment of Assistant Professor. 2.

Mr. A.S.Virk, Advocate, at the outset, submits that impugned advertisement stands withdrawn, thus, the present petition has become infructuous.

3.

Despite matter being called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

In view of statement of learned counsel for the respondentNIT, the present petition has rendered infructuous. ANJU GOEL 2023.07.28 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-35711-2019 -22023:PHHC:096818 5.

Disposed of as infructuous.

6.

There is no representation of the petitioners, thus, the petitioners are at liberty to move an appropriate application, if something survives.

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 28.07.2023 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.07.28 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document