Bhupender Alias Bhoopennder Singh Alias Gugu v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-51797-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-51797-2025 Date of decision: 02.12.2025 Bhupender @ Bhoopender Singh @ Gugu ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY

Present:

Mr. Monty Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Krishan Lal Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY , J (ORAL) 1.

This order shall dispose of present petition for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner, an accused in case FIR No.485 dated 20.06.2025 under Sections 21-B,61,85 of NDPS Act registered at P.S Sadar Hisar. 2.

A perusal of the status report shows that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Past antecedents of the petitioner have also been highlighted in para 10 of the said report. It is further stand of the respondent-State that the petitioner was in constant touch with the co-accused Avtar Singh, who was arrested at the site.

3.

Heard.

4.

On 15.09.2025, following order was passed by this Court: " Present petition under Section 482 BNSS, for grant of pre-arrest bail has been filed by petitioner, who was arrayed as co-accused in case bearing FIR No.485 dated 20.06.2025 registered against him at Police Station Sadar Hisar, District Hisar, for commission of offence punishable under Section 21(B)/61/85 of NDPS Act, 1985.

Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner cropped up only during the disclosure statement of the co-accused Avtar Singh @ Attu, who was caught red handed by the police party, MANOJ KUMAR 2025.12.03 22:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order

CRM-M-51797-2025 while keeping in his possession 190 grams of Heroin. Learned counsel submits that said disclosure statement, in the absence of recovery of any fact, is not admissible in evidence. There being nothing on record indicating that the petitioner was supplier. Taking his submissions further, learned counsel submits that petitioner is willing to join the investigation as and when called for by the IO.

Notice of motion.

Ms. Shweta Nahata, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of State of Haryana and seeks time to file detailed status report. Adjourned to 14.10.2025.

In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when required to do so by the Investigating Agency. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on ad-interim bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner shall also be abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). " 5.

Keeping in view the above submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation, interim bail granted vide order dated 15.09.2025 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Further the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required in future by way of written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; he will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. 6.

The petition stands allowed.

02.12.2025 ( AARADHNA SAWHNEY ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.12.03 22:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order