M/S Nysa Communications Pvt. Ltd. v. Mdu And ORS.
!""# $%
&'
$(
) *(* '
+%( *(
,'
$( (
" -#*./ '%
(
$.0 -/ '%
(
" / '%
(
.*1 &*(/ '%
(
#(2 3 1/ '%
5* , 1'
#'( 7
8 (6( !1 /
*( :* (6( ; ,,"
!#1 #6" ,( "('#" +'('2 ''
/ >#( $
$/ ('
",#(? 11 ',("/ 6(*/ (,'+%(
@ #6" 1# 6* 2(" ,(%' *11 1'
"##1 #1
/ 1" ((%'
/ *11
!#1 ( <(.
< 1#''
A#/ =/ 6# (1'
,( , " #'( 2("
( 121 ''
= / >#( $=/ <** < 11<'
''
/ >#( $8/ < (%'
#, %.2 (6( 1#/ ,,(*2 *
7*( (,1 < '% 1'
6*1
/ <*( '
''
#111 (#1 612 1'
",1 <(.
#'( (
'
. *( " '(, <(.
%21 B#( < '
%' "" ''
/ >#(
!#1 %(# ",1 (%'
2 (2('2 6(* ( (2" ,('#(
C 1"'
'#12'
",(2 (2( #%( (('
DC ''
(2('
2 " ",1 #'( 7 / 8 8 C$!
< #6B# '%/ *% ,,('
%21 B#( #'(<
!#1 (,' ,1'
(1 #, 0#'2"
#(2 *( (#
112 (#'/ "(
,' *% 1 "' (( 0#'2"
!
" #
$%#/ #,,( (2#" (# 112 (#'/ "( ('
!%1
*% *('
#1 '('
*( (,% #6"
* 0#'2" #1 *% '1 <* #6B# 0#'2"
C &
'
(
)
&*+ ,* -#
#
*1'
0#'2"
.
#,( ,( #("
" #( ,(% 6(#2*
@1'2 60 (2('2 112 (#'
#""(1 (0'/ 6(%'
#'(
28. To shut out arbitration at the initial stage would destroy the very purpose for which the parties had entered into arbitration. Furthermore, there is no inherent risk of prejudice to any of the parties in permitting arbitration to proceed simultaneously to the criminal proceedings. In an eventuality where ultimately an award is rendered by arbitral tribunal, and the criminal proceedings result in conviction rendering the underlying contract void, necessary
plea can be taken on the basis of the conviction to resist the execution/enforcement of the award. Conversely, if the matter is not referred to arbitration and the criminal proceedings result in an acquittal and thus leaving little or no ground for claiming that the underlying contract is void or voidable, it would have the wholly undesirable result of delaying the arbitration. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the Court ought to act with caution and circumspection whilst examining the plea that the main contract is void or voidable. The Court ought to decline reference to arbitration only where the Court can reach the conclusion that the contract is void on a meaningful reading of the contract document itself without the requirement of any further proof.
.
#,( " #, '(
"
*! /(
01 !20*
(
-
$ ,> '
< 1'
'< !#( (1( 0#'2" " 1# #1 *( '/ '''
1% 6(% (,('#'
61< : In a recent judgment reported as Rashid Raza (supra), this Court referred to Sikri, J.'s judgment in Ayyasamy (supra) and then held:
4. The principles of law laid down in this appeal make a distinction between serious allegations of forgery/fabrication in support of the plea of fraud as opposed to "simple
allegations". Two working tests laid down in para 25 are: (1) does this plea permeate the entire contract and above all, the agreement of arbitration, rendering it void, or (2) whether the allegations of fraud touch upon the internal affairs of the parties inter se having no implication in the public domain."
35.
After these judgments, it is clear that "serious allegations of fraud" arise only if either of the two tests laid down are satisfied, and not otherwise. The first test is satisfied only when it can be said that the arbitration clause or agreement itself cannot be said to exist in a clear case in which the court finds that the party against whom breach is alleged cannot be said to have entered into the agreement relating to arbitration at all. The second test can be said to have been met in cases in which allegations are made against the State or its instrumentalities of arbitrary, fraudulent, or malafide conduct, thus necessitating the hearing of the case by a writ court in which questions are raised which are not predominantly questions arising from the contract itself or breach thereof, but questions arising in the public law domain."
'%(2 ,( / '
%2 112 1%11'
2 ,'2 1 "( * > (
C %' ' / 112 "(1 ,,( % %2 *"
1#''
*( 1'
'< '
5* #(/ *((/ %< ((,%
#" %2/ '0#' (" (6( 1# "('#" +'('2/ >#( $
$
('21 / , 11<'
(
A# 76/
'
("( 2 !* A# @"*1 @2* !#(/ @#
/ 7( / !*'2(*/ 61
9 / (B#'
'0#' ,(/ #60 ",1 #( (B#("
$( '('
,,( 1('
'/ " ,1 >'
*( %
'1 "/ <11 16( ( 11 1" ' #( 1" ,1
6(% "' *(6% <11 6'2 1('
(B# 1( 12 <* , * ('( (
A#
'
76
,0
E**( 7,.2 '
F E**( ,(61 F