Pawan Kumar @ Tallu v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52698-2025 (O&M) PAWAN KUMAR @ TALLU .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CRM-M-55247-2025 RAJ PANDAY ALIAS PANDIT .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT DECIDED ON:

26.02.2026

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

Present:

Mr. Paras Jagga, Advocate, for the petitioner (in CRM-M-55247-2025), and Mr. C.S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner (in CRM-M-52698-2025).

Mr. Vinay Malhotra, DAG, Punjab.

SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL) 1.

Present petitions have been filed by the petitioners, seeking grant of regular bail, in case, FIR No.32, dated 26.02.2025, under Sections 109, 191(3), 190, 61(2), 194(2) of BNS and section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Moti Nagar Police Commissionerate, District Ludhiana.

LAVISHA 2026.02.26 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh

CRM-M-52698-2025 (O&M) CRM-M-55247-2025 -22.

Since recording of evidence before the trial Court has not yet commenced, plea for grant of regular bail to the petitioners cannot be entertained, at this stage.

3.

Accordingly, present petitions stand disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file a fresh petition(s), after a period of four months, or as and when evidence of the material prosecution witnesses has been recorded, whichever is earlier. 4.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) 26.02.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.02.26 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh